Just when you thought the legislative session was going to
close on the equitable funding discussion for McCleary, the House and Senate
came out with Teacher Compensation proposals late last week. The
competing proposals would shift the funding for teacher compensation away from
local taxpayers and over to the state. The resulting shift would have the
state to fully fund basic education and leave levies, as originally intended,
to pay for additional enhancements.
The Senate Republican version (SB
6109) features a levy swap – meaning that levy authorization would be
reduced and the state would start collecting the property tax that it is
allocated under state law. This would mean that revenue would be
allocated on a statewide average, and not based on the local economy. The
challenge, however, is equity for school districts which have higher property
values and how to ensure that taxpayers are not paying more and getting less in
those districts. The bill results in a lot of complicated math which sent
local school administrators scrambling back to their finance officers to see
how the numbers affected them and the taxpayers they serve.
Senate Democrats offer a capital gains tax of 7% (SB
6104 and SB
6102), but it exempts home sales, and other investments. It is
believed that the total number of people affected by this proposal is 7,500
people statewide. The House kicks the can down the road and develops a
study committee to return to the legislature in 2017. OSPI has
developed its own answer to the problem and will reveal its funding proposal on
Monday morning. Although the Superintendent has his own plan, his staff
had nice things to say about the Senate Republican proposal for its part in
being the most complete answer to the McCleary question so far this
cycle. PTA McCleary Team leader Eden Mack appreciated the completeness of
the proposal, but challenged the Senate to take local taxpayers into
consideration and try to find a statewide financial solution that is fair,
uniform, and equitable.
The legislature ends its regular 105 day session on April
26th. It is highly likely that we will be going into a short special
session to resolve the gap between all the parties involved. After that,
the Supreme Court will take up the issue once again to determine if the
legislature has moved far enough down the road to warrant the contempt finding
removed.
No comments:
Post a Comment